Agroforestry adoption leading to increased habitat diversity

Integration of trees and crops providing shelter for wildlife

Restoration of hedgerows and buffer zones leading to habitat connectivity

Planting native species along field borders

Reduction of pesticide use through integrated pest management leading to pollinator protection

Implementation of IPM techniques

Promotion of organic farming leading to healthier ecosystems

Conversion to organic practices

Support for local conservation projects leading to species protection

Collaboration with NGOs and authorities

Deforestation for agricultural expansion contributing to habitat loss

Conversion of forests to croplands or pasture

Overuse of agrochemicals contributing to soil and water toxicity

Excessive application of fertilizers and pesticides

Monoculture cropping contributing to species decline

Large-scale planting of single crop varieties

Overgrazing leading to land degradation and biodiversity loss

High livestock density without rotation

Illegal hunting or fishing contributing to species decline

Non-compliance with wildlife protection laws

Regulatory tightening on land use and conservation leading to higher compliance costs

New rules to protect habitats and endangered species

Loss of ecosystem services due to biodiversity decline

Reduced pollination, pest control, or soil fertility

Legal liability for habitat destruction or species loss

Lawsuits or fines for non-compliance with biodiversity laws

Brand damage from association with biodiversity loss

Negative media or stakeholder attention

Increased insurance costs for biodiversity-related risks

Insurers raising premiums for high-risk activities

Development of biodiversity-friendly product certifications leading to market advantage

Certification and marketing of eco-friendly products

Access to funding for biodiversity conservation projects

Government or private grants for habitat restoration

Partnerships with research institutes for biodiversity monitoring

Joint projects on species and habitat assessment

Expansion into markets demanding biodiversity-friendly products

Meeting strict requirements for eco-labels

Promotion of pollinator habitats leading to improved crop yields

Planting wildflower strips and reducing pesticide use

Restoration of wetlands leading to improved water regulation

Rehabilitating natural wetland areas

Agroecology practices leading to enhanced soil fertility

Use of crop rotation, cover crops, and organic inputs

Support for ecosystem service payments leading to rural development

Participation in PES schemes

Implementation of sustainable water management practices leading to aquifer recharge

Adoption of efficient irrigation and water-saving technologies

Overextraction of water resources leading to reduced ecosystem function

Excessive irrigation withdrawals

Soil degradation from unsustainable practices reducing fertility

Intensive tillage and lack of crop rotation

Loss of pollinators due to pesticide use

Application of neonicotinoid pesticides

Contamination of water sources from runoff

Runoff of fertilizers and pesticides into rivers/lakes

Loss of ecosystem services due to land conversion

Conversion of natural habitats to agriculture

Increased costs due to loss of ecosystem services

Need to replace natural services with artificial inputs