On 21 April 2026, Ofcom published a non-confidential version of the Confirmation Decision issued to 4chan on 19 March 2026 in relation to its failure to comply with its duties under sections 9(2), 10(5) and 12 of the Online Safety Act 2023 in respect of 4chan.org.
On 19 March 2026, Ofcom issued 4chan with a Confirmation Decision in relation to its failure to comply with its duties under sections 9(2), 10(5) and 12 of the Act in respect of 4chan.org. In respect of these failures, Ofcom imposed on 4chan a requirement to carry out a suitable and sufficient illegal content risk assessment in respect of 4chan.org by 2 April 2026, a single penalty of £50,000 and, in the case of continued non-compliance, an additional daily rate penalty of £200 per day, starting from the day after the deadline for complying with the requirements until the date on which section 9(2) is complied with or, if sooner, 1 June 2026.
On 12 February 2026, Ofcom issued 4chan with a provisional notice of contravention, as Ofcom considered that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the platform had contravened its duties under sections 9, 10 and 12 of the OSA.
On 4 December 2025, Ofcom expanded its investigation to include consideration of whether there were reasonable grounds to believe that 4chan had failed, or was failing, to comply with its duties under section 12 of the Act.
On 18 November 2025, Ofcom published a non-confidential version of the Confirmation Decision issued to 4chan on 13 October 2025 in relation to its failure to comply with two information notices under section 102(8)(a) of the Act.
On 13 October 2025, Ofcom issued 4chan with a Confirmation Decision in relation to its failure to comply with two statutory information requests, imposing a fixed penalty of £20,000 on 4chan in respect of both breaches. 4chan was also required to take immediate steps to comply with section 102(8)(a).
On 13 August 2025, Ofcom issued 4chan Community Support LLC with a provisional notice of contravention, having been satisfied that there were reasonable grounds for believing the provider had contravened its duties under section 102(8) of the Act to comply with two requests for information.